Where the Wild Things Are

Judith: Happiness isn't always the best way to be happy.

This wasn't a book I really read as a child and normally a film adaptation of a 300 word picture book wouldn't be something I'd pay attention to (considering the outcome of numerous Seuss adaptations), but after seeing the trailer for this live-action Spike Jonze's film, I knew it would be different. One thing that was obvious after seeing it was that this isn't a kids' film (unfortunately for the adorable little boy dressed as Max that we met outside the theater) and that may have cost it theatrical success, but for adults, it's an interesting look at what it means to be a child and what it means to grow up.

Max, a rambunctious, imaginative little boy, feels ignored and helpless. His sister is too busy with her friends to pay any attention to him and his mother is preoccupied with work and her new boyfriend. After throwing a tantrum, Max runs away from home, sailing across the sea to the land where the wild things are. He becomes their king and immediately gets all the friends and attention he wants. But when real problems start to interrupt his eternal playtime, Max begins to see that the world is more complicated than he thought.

SPOILERS AHEAD

Where the Wild Things Are is a beautifully shot film with wonderful sets and landscapes. The acting, especially by the star Max Records, brings the whole thing to life with the actors playing the wild things (James Gandolfini, Paul Dano, Catherine O'Hara, Forest Whitaker, Chris Cooper, and Lauren Ambrose) doing a great job of emulating the childish behavior that script draws upon. And the childishness isn't always the idealized, joyful innocence we prefer to remember but also the stubbornness, pettiness, and selfishness. Max, angry at his mother, runs away from home and finds the wild things who are trying to calm down Carol, who's having his own tantrum and destroying their houses. And even though Max and Carol become friends, Carol's initial tantrum looms over the rest of the story as a threat to any sort of peace and happiness Max tries to establish. As king, Max concerns himself with the superficial needs of his subjects, but he is unable to take care of their emotional needs. Many of them are unsure of their place in the group, in constant need of love and reassurance, feeling that the others are treating them unfairly or that they are being replace by the ones they love most. All of them are children with none of the perspective that time brings. They're all so concerned with being hurt that they are heedless of who they hurt. Max, now in the role of a parent, is forced to look beyond himself and finally realizes how his own behavior has affected his mother. And so, he returns home to find his worried mother waiting for him with a bowl of soup.

But as viewers, this glimpse into the bittersweet memories of our childhood reminds us not only of the mentality children are struggling with but also shows us the immaturity of our own selfishness. Even when we're grown it can be difficult to see beyond ourselves and recognize that one friend doesn't preclude the other and just because we want something now doesn't mean we are owed it. This is certainly not a film for children but rather a film about children. A reminder of where we have been and where we are going.

Shanghai Noon

Roy O'Bannon: I don't know karate, but I know kar-azy and I will use it.

Shanghai Noon is one of those movies that most everyone saw when it first came out and then promptly forgot, but I think it deserves to be remembered. It's a charming comedy that holds up well and seamlessly blends the western and kung-fu film while simultaneously spoofing both. For all it's simplicity, it's a really well-written comedy that shows off the best of Owen Wilson and Jackie Chan. Having rewatched it recently, it struck me how few films are made that have a lighthearted sense of humor that can be enjoyed by all ages while not losing it wit and charm in trying to be inoffensive enough for families. A solid adventure, with a lot of clever references to older westerns that turns the stereotypes on their heads. A great movie for a rainy day.

America in Film

A friend of mine who goes to grad school with a lot of foreign students recently discovered that most of them had never seen the Star Wars trilogy. While setting up a screening to correct this unforgivable lapse in their pop culture knowledge, he realized there must be lots of films they haven't seen that they should before they become Americans. So, he asked several of his friends for a list of films that are integral to American cultural history and films that helped shaped current pop culture.

It's an interesting question, really. How do you define America in a limited number of films? Is it the films you like best or the films that best known? What genres should get the most spots? What directors and actors do you include? For pop culture films, the list could be endless. It would be easier to just compile a playlist of scenes on YouTube. After all, no one should be forced to sit through Five Easy Pieces just to see the Chicken Salad Scene. So, after careful consideration, here are my lists:

How to Be an American in 10 Films:
1. Casablanca
2. Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
3. Gone with the Wind
4. The Wizard of Oz
5. To Kill a Mockingbird
6. Singin' in the Rain
7. The Godfather
8. Rear Window
9. Red River
10. The Maltese Falcon

How to Understand Americans in 10 Films:
1. Star Wars
2. Indiana Jones
3. Back to the Future
4. ET
5. Rocky
6. The Terminator
7. Nightmare Before Christmas
8. Pulp Fiction
9. Fight Club
10. Ghostbusters

The Middle

Last week I wound up having to watch the first two seasons of The Middle, a sitcom I previously did not know existed, despite it now being in its fourth season. After watching an episode, I knew why. This show takes the basic setup up for a sitcom by centering on a supposedly average American family and manages to water it down into an unfunny, cliche, and unrealistic mess. It centers on wife and working mother Frankie, her stoic husband Mike, and their three kids Axl (the athletic one), Sue (the awkward one), and Brick (the nerdy one). Though they are supposed to be a middle class family living in a small Midwestern town, they seem to be constantly teetering on the brink of financial ruin, as indicated by them being unable to pay their electricity bill for four months, and live exclusively on fast food with the occasional frozen processed meal to add variety. Frankie is the main character and narrates the show which mostly consists of her complaining about her family and with good reason. Their kids are spoiled rotten, needing constant nagging to accomplish things as simple as picking up their socks to tasks that are obviously their responsibility like doing their schoolwork. They consistently flout their parents' wishes, occasionally showing levels of disrespect that most parents wouldn't put up with but the Hecks excuse or try to justify. Frankie, of course, lost her right to complain since she always comes to her kids rescue so that they never have to face the consequences of their poor choices, the impetus of many of the episode plots.

All this would be forgivable if the show had any wit or originality. The jokes that don't revolve around Frankie complaining often contain baffling lapses in logic. For instance, when Frankie is taking a bath because of her bad back, nine-year-old Brick wanders in and she asks him to turn on the hot water. Brick reminds her that he is not allowed to use the hot water (bringing up some disturbing questions about how he takes showers) but he turns on the hot water anyway. When Frankie asks he to turn it off, he winds up turning it up because apparently hot water faucets are so different than cold water faucets that when given two options of how to turn it off, he repeatedly chooses the wrong one. This and dozens of other ill-conceived jokes make me question whether the writers have so little imagination they couldn't come up with realistic jokes and they simply forgot they weren't writing for the Disney Channel. The whole tone of the show is toothless, lacking the guts to realistically make fun of anything (like Modern Family) and unwilling to alienate anybody by being absurd enough to get away with more ridiculous elements (like Arrested Development). I'm completely at a loss for how this show is still on the air and wouldn't recommend it for anyone, especially when there are shows like Parks and Rec, Modern Family, Community, and The Mindy Project. They may not be perfect but at least they have some guts.

American Horror Story: Murder House

Larry Harvey: I'm trying very hard not to judge you.
Ben Harmon: Me? You murdered your entire family!
Larry Harvey: Yes, but I was never unfaithful. 

In its first season, American Horror Story, an FX show created by Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk, follows the Harmons, a family that has unwittingly moved into the Murder House. They move there to get a fresh start after the wife Vivien has a miscarriage and the husband Ben has an affair, but the house, haunted by its own gruesome past, threatens not only their safety but their sanity. In addition to the house, they must contend with the machinations of their unwelcome neighbor Constance, a horribly disfigured former resident Larry Harvey, and Tate, a young psychopath wooing their daughter Violet.

While this is a very well-scripted show that relies on psychological horror rather than shock value, the truly interesting thing about it is its structure. Because it is a cable show, each season is twelve episodes long and each season is a different, unrelated story, that uses the same cast. While season one is the story of the Murder House, season two is set in an Asylum in the 60s. Murphy and Falchuk have taken what I consider to be an underused format in American television, the mini-series, and rebranded it into something marketable and cool. It allows them to delve into a story and characters for longer than a two hour movie but does not weigh them down with an obligation to always leave the story open-ended to allow for unlimited future seasons. So many interesting shows struggle after their first or second season simply because they must stretch a good story past its breaking point, but if the format of American Horror Story catches on, we could be looking at a whole new type of television show that's already told some very interesting stories in the UK. Hopefully the success of this show helps to change the way producers and viewers think about mini-series so that we can get shows that recognize the value of resolution as much as set-up.It would have gone a long way for shows like Lost and Heroes.

Wanted

Sloan: It a choice, Wesley, that each of us must face: to remain ordinary, pathetic, beat-down, coasting through a miserable existence, like sheep herded by fate - or you can take control of your own destiny and join us, releasing the caged wolf you have inside.

Wanted, based on a graphic novel I haven't read, is the frequently mocked film by Russian director Timur Bekmambetov. It stars James McAvoy as Wesley, an office drone who discovers he comes from a line of elite weaver-assassins when he is recruited by sexy assassin Fox (Angelina Jolie). The head of this group, known as The Fraternity, is Sloan (Morgan Freeman) who shows Wesley the Loom of Fate, a piece of fabric who tells them who to kill next to keep chaos in check. When the Loom of Fate tells Wesley to kill the man who killed his father, he discovers The Fraternity might not be all it's cracked up to be.

First off, you have to know that when you're watching a movie that involves a group of weaver-assassins and a Loom of Fate, the plot is a secondary consideration. It's not going to be very deep or original and in fact may even stretch the bounds of credulity. In a lot of ways, it's essentially a poor man's Fight Club. But you read the plot description and you watched it anyway, so stop complaining. What's really great about this movie is the action. Bekmambetov, the director of Russian blockbusters Night Watch and Day Watch and more recently Abraham Lincoln:Vampire Hunter, was born to direct action movies. He really has a way of creating memorable and innovative effects (even if they do laugh in the face of physics). This is not a movie with a plot. This is a kick-ass action sequence strung together by some snappy one-liners. And also, some stunningly engraved bullets and cool-looking guns.

In conclusion, people need to stop making fun of me for owning this movie. If you don't like it, you're watching it wrong.

Anna Karenina

Alexei Karenin: We are bound together by God and this can only be broken by a crime against God! 

Anna Karenina, the latest period drama from Joe Wright, interweaves the stories of several romantic relationships with the adulteress Anna Karenina (Keira Knightly) as the focus. Married to the dutiful and respected Alexei Karenin (Jude Law), Anna becomes unexpectedly love stuck when she meets and is pursued by the dashing Count Alexei Vronsky (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). As their affair intensifies and Karenin becomes aware of it, she is forced to choose between her child and her lover. Meanwhile, her brother Oblonsky (Matthew MacFadyen) has problems when his wife Dolly (Kelly MacDonald) discovers he is cheating on her, farmer and landowner Konstantin Levin (Domhnall Gleeson) woos Dolly's young, innocent sister Kitty (Alicia Vikander), and Levin's socialist brother Nikolai Levin (David Wilmot) flies in the face of convention by marrying a woman from a brothel, Masha (Tannishtha Chatterjee).

SPOILERS AHEAD

This adaptation is actually pretty close to the book which I have read (I'll wait for your impressed gasps to subside), but like all the best adaptations, this uses its new medium to transform it to complement the themes of the book and make it more accessible to modern audiences. Wright uses a stage with moving set pieces and painted backdrops to convey the attitudes and strictly enforced rules of behavior of the Russian aristocracy. Everything they do is watched and judged by their peers because if they disrupt the carefully choreographed steps, it affects them all. This device, which minimizes the amount of exposition necessary in the beginning, reaches a beautiful, intense climax in the dance between Anna and Vronsky which marks the beginning of their relationship. While there are still many of his trademarks as a director, Wright really takes a creative step forward with this film.

In the story of Anna Karenina, it can be difficult to know who to sympathize with. After all, Anna and Vronsky are truly in love and Anna must suffer through being shunned by the society she was raised in because of that love. Karenin isn't understanding at all and refuses both a divorce and visitation rights to Anna. But Karenin really is the one who is wronged. His wife not only shamefully cheats on him, exposing him to the censure of his peers, but also deprives him of the supportive wife he thought he married. Is he really wrong to protect his son and heir from being raised by his mother, now a social outcast that would prevent him from rising in society? Love is not an excuse for hurting others and turning your back on your responsibilities. Vronsky, the man who pursued Anna knowing she was married, is arguably the least sympathetic and deserves having to deal with her emotional meltdown since he instigated the whole situation. Anna, on the other hand, is punished for her infidelity with her intense paranoia and depression. Living with Vronsky, she can never be truly happy because she can never be sure of him, the man who lured her away from her husband. But she is not blameless either. Karenin gave her multiple opportunities to repent and return to him but she repeatedly chose Vronsky over Karenin and her son. This central story is contrasted primarily with the innocent and honest relationship between Levin and Kitty who are pure and devoted in their marriage. But we also see the effect of male infidelity on a relationship with Oblonsky, who loves his wife but indulges in dalliances with younger women, and the devotion that can exist between two unmarried people, Nikolai and Masha, who have never been unfaithful but reject social conventions.

The movie manages to convey the complexity and depth of the novel while using the visuals to enhance the storytelling and make it more accessible to people who might be unwilling to read the 800+ page novel. With lavish sets and remarkable acting, it's well worth the price of admission.